Interesting perspective on managing lean..
Source: http://www.industryweek.com/articles/how_you_change_is_the_change_26124.aspx?ShowAll=1
Lean management is not a change methodology. It is a destination, a desired set of practices and culture. How you get there will determine the outcome.
By Lawrence M. Miller, www.ManagementMeditations.com
There are far more failures than successes as companies attempt to
implement lean manufacturing or lean culture. I believe that most of
those failures are the result of the absence of sound change management
strategies and skills. How you change creates a set of expectations for
what will follow. You create a "pull" for adoption of the change, or you
struggle to "push" the string of change up hill.
Most managers and most consultants do not make the distinction
between the destination and the method of travel. The destination can be
defined as maximizing customer satisfaction, eliminating waste in all
its forms, reducing variances or quality problems, speeding cycle times
through core processes, and it can be defined as a culture of continuous
improvement and empowerment. But knowing the "what" is like looking at a
photo of Mr. Universe and saying, "I want to look like that!" That's
easy. But, getting there is something else. Most failures are not the
result of failing to know what you want to look like. Rather, they are
failures in the process of change.
Here are some of the keys to successful lean implementation and culture change from my experience.
1. Ownership is 80% of success - The first rule of change management is: People will implement and make successful that for which they feel ownership.
Too often, the very people who are required to implement a change
in processes or culture have it imposed upon them and do not feel that
they had any say in its creation. This will almost guarantee failure.
The worst way to go about change is to hire a high- priced consultant
and have him or her study, write a report, make a presentation, and
leave the implementation to those who struggle with the day-to-day
realities of life.
Habitat for Humanity knows something about managing change. Their
program of building homes for the disadvantaged is not merely about
putting up structures. It is about building human capacity and human
dignity. When they build a home for a family they ask the members of
that family to contribute "sweat equity", their own labor to the
construction of the home. This has the effect of giving the new owners a
feeling of pride in "their home" that they helped to build. The
probability of the family caring for and maintaining the home goes up in
proportion to their sense of ownership.
Most senior managers have insufficient appreciation for the human
capacity within their own people. For many years I have been
facilitating internal "design teams" comprised of both first-line
employees and managers who are assigned the work of redesigning their
work processes and their social system or culture. These are the people
who have their feet on the ground and have true knowledge of how things
work in the organization. They invite in their customers and listen to
their concerns. They map out the current state of the work process and
identify all the variances that cause waste in the process. And, they
analyze the culture, the sources of motivation and decision processes.
Then, they design the future state, an "ideal state" that transforms
both the work process and culture.
I can honestly say that after doing approximately 100 redesign
projects it has never failed that those who design the future will
develop a passionate commitment to their own design and will fight for
its implementation and success. There is this commitment because it is
literally "their own" design. It does not belong to a consultant or to
senior management. These folks will make it work! That is 50% of
success.
2. Build Competence, Don't be Consultant Dependent.
Gaining ownership leads toward the development of competence in
those who will implement the new design. But the building of internal
capacity must go beyond that ownership. It must develop the skills of
change management and skills and tools of training and developing people
to live within a lean organization.
I am not anti-consultant. After all, I are one! However,
consultants are very often misused. Consulting firms are all too happy
to have you dependent on their consultants, the more the merrier, for a
long time. That is, after all, how they make money. But, is that in the
best interest of the client?
The longer a client is dependent on a consultant the less likely
it is that the consultant is transferring his or her competence to the
client organization and building capacity within the client firm. I
recently completed an assignment at a Merck manufacturing plant where 71
teams are implementing lean practices in every department and function
and at every level of the organization. Everyone is involved. My role
was to work with the senior team of the plant and to train and coach 14
internal coaches, both salaried and hourly, who serve as coaches to all
of the other teams. Who learns the most in this scheme? Of course, the
internal coaches who have to turn around and train all of the other
teams. They now have the capacity to carry on the process indefinitely.
As a team of coaches they meet and learn from each other. This internal
consulting team can now learn virtually any new practice that comes
along and serve as vanguard for implementation. They don't need me
anymore.
3. You Won't Get It Right the First Time -- Plan for Experimentation and Iteration.
When either Honda or Toyota have designed a new car and is
preparing to manufacture that car, and even though they may have the
world's best manufacturing engineers, they do not assume it will all go
right the first time. An auto assembly plant may produce a thousand cars
a day. But, when these companies are beginning production of an
entirely new car they close the plant production to zero, install the
required new equipment and programs, retrain all the employees on the
new car and the new jobs around its production, and then they make ONE
car. They watch that car go through the production process. Inevitably,
they find things that don't work as planned. They may find machines that
need to be re-adjusted or re-programmed. They may find workers who have
not been fully trained. They will fix these things and then build
another car. It may take months to gradually build up to full
production.
Perhaps your managers implementing a major change are smarter than
the Honda or Toyota manufacturing engineers, but I doubt it. The idea
that we are so smart that we can design something that is complex to
work perfectly the first time is pure arrogance, and arrogance is the
worst enemy of continuous improvement. It forces managers to try to
cover mistakes, inhibits learning and creates waste.
Design the new process and the new human systems as best you can.
Then implement those changes with an "attitude of science," a
willingness to try things out, then make adjustments and modifications.
This attitude will drive out fear, maximize learning and maximize the
rate of improvement.
4. Partner with Your Customers.
It is not you against the world unless that is how you choose to
write the script. I am currently leading a couple of design teams that
are redesigning the core work process of a service organization. They
have major problems with unhappy customers. The design team invited in
the managers of those customers, the very managers who are unhappy with
the service they are receiving, and asked them for help. The design team
asked the customers what improvements they would like to see. They
asked if they knew of any best practices that they should adopt. And
they asked the customer if they would help them in their effort to
design the ideal service delivery system. It works every time! I have
seen this over and over again. If you ask a customer for help in
developing a better way to serve them, they always agree to help! Now
you have a partner in your customer.
Every interaction with a customer is a sales call. Every interaction either increases or decreases the probability of future business. Asking the customer to co-create a solution to serve them is one of the best sales calls you will ever make. You have created a new partnership, a new co-owner of the house you are building for them. They will help you make it successful.
Every interaction with a customer is a sales call. Every interaction either increases or decreases the probability of future business. Asking the customer to co-create a solution to serve them is one of the best sales calls you will ever make. You have created a new partnership, a new co-owner of the house you are building for them. They will help you make it successful.
5. Invite In the Whole-System -- Embrace the Complexity.
Every organization is a complex system, an ecology, with a variety
of sub-systems (people systems, financial systems, information systems)
all interacting with one another to determine the course of the whole.
Just like our economy, the human body or the culture of a country, the
culture and competitiveness of a company is never the result of one
system standing on its own. Yet, we hire a consultant to redesign the
work flow. Another to implement teams or a motivation system. While
another is redesigning the flow of information and another may be
redesigning the structure. It is a prescription for the creation of
waste. All of these systems must be aligned to the same principles and
goals. They are all interacting and interdependent. If you don't
approach major change with an appreciation for this interaction and
interdependence, you are programming in failure.
Charter a design team to implement lean principles through the
whole system, the core work process of the organization, and the
enabling or support systems. If the human resource processes are not
designed to enable the work of the core work process, you have reduced
the chance of success. If you have not designed the IT/IS systems to
provide those who do the real work of service to customers with the
information they need, you have again reduced the chance of success.
6. Get in the Boat and Row; Stop Standing at the Shore!
Be the change! If you want change in your organization, LEAD! Lead
doesn't mean writing encouraging memos. Leading is not simply deciding
to go, or approving a budget. Leading is leading, being out front, doing
what you want others to do. Be the model!
Twenty years ago Nevius Curtis was the chairman of Delmarva Power
and Light. He wanted to transform his organization into a fully
empowered, high performance organization. In my first meeting with him I
told him that if he really wanted to succeed, he needed to make his
team "Team No. 1." He needed to have his team go through the same
training, do the same things he desired of every other team in the
organization. He signed up and he signed up his team. In a few years
Delmarva became recognized as a model for quality management and
empowerment. That effort has sustained to this day. It worked because
the leader provided true leadership. He didn't stand on the shore and
yell "Row" or criticize the efforts of others. He provided a model.
If you want to create genuine and lasting change you will get in
the boat and pull on the oars, and you will soon find that you have an
army of rowers all pulling behind you, and in the same direction!
Lawrence M. Miller has been doing organizational change
consulting for 35 years, beginning with his work creating a free economy
in prisons. He has worked with Honda, Shell Oil, and dozens of other
corporations. He is the author of nine books, most recently Lean Culture
-- The Leader's Guide. His website and blog is www.ManagementMeditations.com.
1 comment:
Great blog!!! Change management is a process for reducing and managing conflict to modify when implementing method, technology or organizational change. http://www.blanchardinternational.co.in/leadership-development-strategy
Post a Comment